Search for: "U.S. v. Remington" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The overarching objective of these rulemakings is to promote the long-term sustainability of the U.S. financial system. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am by azatty
” And here is an examination of whether proposed laws conflict with the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 8:18 pm by Michael Atkins
Besides the incredibly accomplished Chinese Supreme Court justices and other distinguished Chinese jurists, I joined experts Mike Remington (copyright law) and Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader (patent law) to talk about new developments in U.S. trademark law. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am by admin
” “This decision and its predecessor — the District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
American Dental Ass'n, 527 U.S. 526 (1999). [read post]