Search for: "U.S. v. Sanchez*"
Results 101 - 120
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2009, 4:06 am
" Poulakis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 8:17 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:35 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
S174475, remains pending on remand from the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:02 am
Rivera, 2007 U.S. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:10 am
Pressley, 2011 U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2006, 5:22 am
U.S., __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 2088270 (N.D. [read post]
7 Aug 2006, 5:22 am
U.S., __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 2088270 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 3:50 pm
Wells, 2008 U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:42 pm
U.S., 284 U.S. 299 (1932). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
USA v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:50 am
Since the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. ___ (2011). [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:13 am
Going back in time is difficult in the real world. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 10:28 am
Down here in San Diego, in federal court, we put pretty much everyone in full-body shackles. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:56 am
Your lawyers are telling you that you're going to be convicted, and are explaining why. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm
Regardless, Judge Sanchez's majority opinion says that it's not clear that the judge relied that much on the (alleged) broken promise, whereas Judge Mendoza (in dissent) thinks that the judge probably did.You can read the record for yourself and see which view you fight most appealing in this regard.But I can add one thing -- something that's maybe (okay, certainly) not subject to judicial notice, but is nonetheless something as to which I'm fairly/supremely… [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:41 pm
San Diego is not Los Angeles.So holds the Ninth Circuit.Okay, so it's a bit more complicated than that. [read post]
31 May 2017, 12:20 pm
By a single vote, the en banc panel holds unconstitutional the Southern District of California's routine practice of shackling every single defendant who appears in court for pretrial proceedings.Judge Kozinski's majority opinion is, in my view, masterful. [read post]
