Search for: "U.S. v. Slovak*"
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm
X v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:32 pm
Since the issuance of these travel bans, U.S. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In July 2005, Phillip was mobilized by the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
” “And therefore the consumer cannot properly be considered as an ‘owner’ of the vehicle software” – Natasha started her presentation on precarious ownership by referring to the claims of John Deere submitted in a government policy review to the U.S. government in 2014, in which the company’s argument rested on the claim that tractor buyers do not own the networked software systems that are integral to the operation of modern tractors. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
The future of investment arbitration after Achmea v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:00 am
Key Findings Although there is no empirical standard for what constitutes a “fair share” of the tax burden, tax fairness is often used by leading international organizations, such as the European Commission, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as the Tax Justice Network, to justify higher taxes on businesses and corporations. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
In the U.S. the net neutrality rules expressly exclude illegal materials. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 4:21 pm
On procedural grounds, in accordance with the New York Convention, a court may refuse to recognise or enforce an arbitral award ex officio if it find out that doing otherwise would be contrary to the public policy of that country [article V(2)(b)]; by contract, an ICSID award can be annulled only due to a serious departure from a fundamental rule of procedure [ICSID Convention, article 52(1)(d), Arbitration Rules 50(1)(c)(iii)]. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Drew Hinshaw & Catherine Luckey, U.S. [read post]
