Search for: "U.S. v. Stanford (melvin)"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm
Shubha Ghosh, Crandall Melvin Professor of Law and Director of the Technology Commercialization Law Program at Syracuse University College of Law In Stanford v Roche, 563 U.S. 776 (2011), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bayh-Dole Act did not create special rules of patent ownership for universities and other recipients of federal research funding. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
I taught it again in 2011 and provided a self analysis of the course at Larry Catá Backer, "Elements of Law" Course 2.0: A Framework Course for the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
CA) and Monsanto v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Melvin Lloyd Co., 315 U.S. 561, 563 (1942). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
So far as books by Justices are concerned, this new offering is more refined, extensive, and current than what had appeared previously in Fenton Martin and Robert Goehlert’s The U.S. [read post]
