Search for: "ULLMANN V US"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
Division of significant assets, using teams of lawyers can quickly add up. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
This claim is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim, as plaintiff’s complaints regarding the over billing were not a direct challenge to the quality of the work but instead a claim that the fee paid bore no rational relationship to the work performed (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Johnson, 129 AD3d at 70). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm
Ullmann from the verdict of an angry jury's lethal verdict won't be easy. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:36 am
In this Case Egnotovich v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:06 am
Egnotovich v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:18 am
In this Case Egnotovich v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
Using landmark Fourth Amendment cases, Judge Gorsuch distinguishes the case at hand from U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
" Ullmann v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
” Ullmann v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:01 pm
Ullmann, a.a.O., Rdnr. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
V. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:40 am
Ullmann v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 3:43 am
ECOWASThe Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Sure enough, there is one other, just a floor below the Cheshire spectacle: State v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
Accordingly, his successor in title was left of the PCT application, probably to satisfy US law. [read post]
