Search for: "UMG Recording, Inc ."
Results 61 - 80
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
Also in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
UMG Recordings, et. al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am
See also UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:45 am
The Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Rock River Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
YouTube In 2006, Viacom International Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:56 pm
” UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
UMG v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm
Aereo, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:54 am
UMG Recordings, Inc, the court was faced with the question of whether the hip hop group Public Announcement had infringed the copyright in the George Clinton song “Atomic Dog” by sampling “dog” as a musical punctuation, rhythmic panting, and the well-loved refrain “bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:09 pm
By Eric Goldman UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:04 am
Escape Media Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 pm
Peter Zimmerman On Tuesday, a New York state appellate court made a curious decision in a matter being litigated between Grooveshark parent company Escape Media Group, Inc. and UMG Recordings, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
By Eric Goldman Viacom International Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
ReDigi Inc., 2013 WL 1286134 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
– March 11, 2013 Appellate Court Clears Veoh in UMG Copyright Suit: (Last discussed in ELU032, July 2012) Variety: http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/appellate-court-clears-veoh-in-umg-copyright-suit-1200194954/ THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-hands-veoh-win-428588 UMG Recordings v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
Amazon.com, Inc., 351 F. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label… [read post]
