Search for: "UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC" Results 181 - 200 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2009, 12:11 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., ____F.3rd____, 2009 WL 2183267 (3rd Cir. 2009) Decided July 23, 2009 [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
 (c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Brad Pauley
Review Granted United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, S197722—Review Granted and Held—December 21, 2011 The court ordered briefing deferred pending the decision in Kirby v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1, 12-13 (Cal Pak Delivery)), and if the named plaintiffs have lent their names to litigation that is controlled by class counsel. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
United Parcel Service Inc., in holding that an employee engages in protected activity when employee’s complaint is reasonable and made with a good faith belief that the complained of conduct violates the LAD. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:32 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 07-4588 (3d Cir. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:57 pm by AALRR
United Parcel Service, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that Labor Code section 1194 does not bar an employer prevailing on a claim for allegedly unpaid overtime wages or minimum wages from recovering its costs (i.e., certain litigation expenses) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1032(b), which states: "Except as expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:34 pm by Jason Krebs
 Drivers for shippers such as FedEx Corp. and United Parcel Service Inc. can still use portable computers in their vehicles to scan package deliveries and drop- offs and respond to messages from dispatchers. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am by Kelly Ann Bird
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:10 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
United Parcel Service, Inc., the same case the Supreme Court agreed on July 1 to hear during its next term. [read post]