Search for: "UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC"
Results 241 - 260
of 406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
(collectively "Stolt-Nielsen") are engaged in a "global conspiracy to restrain competition in the world market for parcel tanker shipping services in violation of federal antitrust laws. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
AT&T, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:14 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., 234 F.3d 998, 1000 (7th Cir. 2000) . . . [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., contains a terrific silver lining for employers. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Layne Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:11 am
United Parcel Service the Fifth Circuit has held that a general non-discrimination provision in a collective bargaining agreement coupled with a grievance procedure that does not expressly apply to statutory claims is insufficient to waive an employee's right to a judicial forum for claimed violations of Title VII. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Many companies have successfully obtained trademark protection for a single color, for example, United Parcel Service’s registration for the color brown for transportation and delivery services, Reg. 2901090; Tiffany’s multiple registrations for a particular color of blue used on bags, boxes and various other products and services, Reg. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
The charging party in this case is a current employee of United Parcel Service (UPS), and former member of the Teamsters. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
United Parcel Service, Inc.pdf., Case no. 2:10-cv-08624 (C.D. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:49 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., A-86/87-11, 2013 WL 3716939 (N.J. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:10 pm
Tenet Healthcare (blogged here), in which the Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court order denying class certification, it is the plaintiffs who will cheer United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
Because the EEOC’s Sec. 12112(b)(6) claim was not premised on attendance but rather on the employer’s alleged 100-percent healed requirement, the 12-month policy could be considered an impermissible qualification standard and not an essential function, a federal district court in Illinois, denying the company’s motion to dismiss (EEOC v United Parcel Service, Inc, February 11, 2014, Ellis, S). 12-month leave policy. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:14 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 10-4339, slip op. at 13 (3d Cir. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:00 am
In addition, religious bias claims have yielded $4.9 million in connection with a settleent with United Parcel Service Inc to resolve allegations that UPS failed to promote workers who wore beards or long hair for faith-based reasons. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:44 am
(hereinafter the B & H law firm), to represent him in the prosecution of an action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in March 2005 while working for United Parcel Service due to an allegedly defective condition on a loading dock in Brooklyn. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 6:47 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., case. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:54 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., April 23, 2015, per curiam). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:27 am
For example, in Rau v United Parcel Service, Inc, a federal district court granted summary judgment for an employer on all claims by a female UPS supervisor that depended on allegations that she was treated worse than her ex-boyfriend, who was also a UPS supervisor. [read post]
