Search for: "UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC"
Results 61 - 80
of 412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2020, 7:28 am
The most notable revisions provide employers a broader window during which to prepare for pre-election hearings, which are necessitated when parties do not agree on the voting unit and other issues. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:28 am
The most notable revisions provide employers a broader window during which to prepare for pre-election hearings, which are necessitated when parties do not agree on the voting unit and other issues. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:47 am
See United Parcel Service, Inc., 369 NLRB 1 (2019). [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 8:54 am
The Trump National Labor Relations Board (Board or NLRB) gifted employers a significant win on the eve of the Christmas holiday with its December 23 decision in United Parcel Service, Inc., 369 NLRB No. 1 (UPS), which announced a return to the decades-old standard for deferring to arbitral decisions in unfair labor practice cases alleging discharge or discipline in violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
United Parcel Service, federal courts around the country have been grappling with the proper treatment of accommodation claims. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
But once you start parceling out Thomas’ arguments in that way, you miss not only the life story but also the underlying political and ideological consistency of his thought. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:25 pm
(PTP), and PPS Associates Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:39 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:00 am
In addition, religious bias claims have yielded $4.9 million in connection with a settleent with United Parcel Service Inc to resolve allegations that UPS failed to promote workers who wore beards or long hair for faith-based reasons. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:16 am
United Parcel Services, 135 S. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Based on United Stat es Supreme Court decisions in Berman and Midkiff, it is probable that the Court will apply the more expansive interpretation of the public purpose clause to the federal Constitution. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
The judicial interpretation of the 1908 Michigan Constitution provided the jury with such absolute discretion that a court would have less likelihood of reversal if it gave no instruction at all than if an improper instruction was given.10 Under the 1908 Constitution, the jury could be provided with the cost of the total project, including those amounts of the parcels that settled, to determine whether there was a necessity for the project. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
According to DOJ’s press release: The United States has intervened in three whistleblower cases pending in the Northern District of California against Tetra Tech EC Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:16 pm
United Parcel Service (10th Cir., October 4, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of UPS on Payan's racial discrimination and breach of both contract and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing: critical elements were missing from each claim)*Jara v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 12:42 pm
Facebook said it gave these 61 firms—which ranged from the dating app Hinge to shipping giant United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm
United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2018 ONSC 2946 Computer Associates UK Ltd v The Software Incubator Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 518 (19 March 2018) Great Minds v Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc (2nd.Cir, Mr. 21, 2018) Oracle USA, Inc v Rimini Street, Inc. (9th.Cir.Jan. 8, 2018) Privacy Toronto Real Estate Board v. [read post]
