Search for: "UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Kennedy"
Results 61 - 80
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
The Amtrak statute does admittedly state that Amtrak “is not a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government” and demands that Amtrak be “operated and managed as a for profit corporation. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
United States is 4-1-4, with Justice Ginsburg writing the plurality opinion and Justice Alito concurring in the judgment in a separate opinion. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
Is it about combatting residential segregation to achieve a more integrated set of living patterns across the United States? [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Kennedy, and Harvey C. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States, 122 Yale Law Journal 522 (2012) • Diane P. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
Here's the audio and transcript for today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
(Yes, they certainly did.); etc. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
This involves parallel importation of text books into the United States that were legitimately manufactured abroad. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Union Gas, Atascadero, etc.). [read post]
