Search for: "UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Kennedy"
Results 81 - 100
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:23 am
I have been asked to make the case for the confirmation of the President's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States, without regard to the questions raised after the close of his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:54 pm
United States and Katzenbach v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear: the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
I wrote about Justice Kennedy’s opinion on Monday, and wrote about Justice Alito’s concurring opinion on Tuesday. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
As Justice Kennedy argued in dissent, the states' unanimity in arguing for continuation of the preference is evidence that states want to continue to discriminate against outsiders, not that preventing them from doing so would be chaotic. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
" Steven Skowronek describes a cyclical phenomenon when he observes that the United States experiences reconstructive, affiliated, and disjunctive presidents in regular succession. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
District of Columbia, Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
This question is likely still haunting Cisco following yesterday's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015).In a 6-2 vote (Justice Breyer was recused), the highest court in the United States overturned the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that held that the Cisco could run the "good faith" defence against Commil's claims that Cisco directly infringed its patent for a method of… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
(Yes, they certainly did.); etc. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
I am delighted to share the video recording of the event recently sponsored by the Penn State Law Federalist Society: "Natural Law and the US Constitutional Order" which was held at Penn State law 12 April 2022. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Opponents of the Act argue that this is like United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
