Search for: "UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 pm
United States Forest Service that bars the Forest Service from proceeding with implementation of the Upper Echo Lake Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project in 2014 (Project), and requires the Forest Service to consult with the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
This complicated appeal and decision concerns three United States Forest Service (USFS) projects -- Empire, Slapjack and Basin -- that attempt to fund fire prevention activities in the Plumas National Forest in California by awarding logging contracts to private parties. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:04 am
US Forest Service - 6/17/15. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:23 am
Department of Commerce, and the United States Forest Service (“USFS”) of the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:37 am
The United States contends that the payments and meals were intended as improper inducements because Forest provided these benefits even when the programs were cancelled (and Forest provided no evidence of a bona fide reason for the cancellation), when no licensed health care professionals attended the programs, when the same attendees had attended multiple programs over a short period of time, or when the meals associated with the programs exceeded… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:37 am
The United States contends that the payments and meals were intended as improper inducements because Forest provided these benefits even when the programs were cancelled (and Forest provided no evidence of a bona fide reason for the cancellation), when no licensed health care professionals attended the programs, when the same attendees had attended multiple programs over a short period of time, or when the meals associated with the programs exceeded… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:27 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Montana issued a decision (PDF) on July 27, 2010, in which it held that the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when those agencies issued an Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, and biological opinions for the use of chemical… [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:01 am
After the United States Forest Service approved plans for venting methane gas from the mine, WildEarth Guardians brought suit against the Forest Service, the Department of Interior, and several of their officials under the Administrative Procedure Act, contending that the approval violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
Forest Service and its Chief. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 10:23 am
Moreover, the Court is considering enjoining the use of all aerial fire retardants, except water, in all fifty (50) United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Supreme Court has sent Weyerhaeuser Company v United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 586 U. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
” ***[T]he Forest Service ... has suddenly publicly stated for the first time its intent to publish a Final Environmental Impact Statement ... on ... [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:39 pm
Article says that illegal pot growers “use fertilizers and pesticides long restricted or banned in the United States, including carbofuran and zinc phosphide. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:26 pm
The petitions of the week are: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service") has recently received an application for an incidental take permit under Endangered Species Act section 10(a)(l)(A) to authorize take of the West Coast distinct population segment ("DPS") of fisher (Pekania pennanti) ("fisher") should it or its subpopulations become federally listed. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, this case involves procedural challenges to a United States Forest Service Rule known as the "State Petitions Rule. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:30 am
United States Forest Service, 2008 U.S. [read post]
