Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GINSBURG" Results 81 - 100 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The respondents in the case are Muslim men who lawfully immigrated to the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the court will consider whether administrative law judges of the SEC are officers of the United States within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am by Andrew Hamm
He used to tell the “story of how meaningful it was for him to go up to the podium and say, ‘I’m Thurgood Marshall and I’m representing the United States of America. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the federal bank fraud case that was also argued last week. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
And nearly one third of all federal judges in the United States are now women. [read post]