Search for: "UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 7:58 am
Thank goodness Clarence Gideon did not have to appear opposite you in 1963 and instead, he wrote a five page petition for writ of cert to the highest court in our land, the United States Supreme Court, which ultimately handed down the decision of Gideon v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
In a recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, In re Federal Mogul Global, Inc., No. 01-10578 (JKF) (Bankr. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:36 am by Robert L. Abell
“In this case the government charged the defendants with the wrong crimes,” begins the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
A moment of progress and possibility   Thanks to greater trust between tribal nations and the United States, we are in a moment of real possibility. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
Achmea and the CJEU’s Treatment of Intra-EU BITs The Achmea decision[6] was rendered following a reference from the German Bundesgerichtshof (federal court) to the CJEU.[7] Briefly, the case concerned the setting-aside of an ad-hoc investor-State arbitration, established under United Nations Commission for International Trade Law (‘UNCITRAL’) rules and seated in Frankfurt, between the Dutch insurance company Achmea BV and Slovakia. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Thompson (Prison Hair Length Policies, Native American Religious Freedom)United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlSprint Communications Company L.P. v. [read post]
Background Helen Schardein owned an insurance, real estate, and abstracting company, as well as several rental units. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Furthermore, if trust is supposed to be the EPO’s vision, why does the EPO President apparently believe the EPO needs an “investigative unit” (aka as “Stasi” in examiners’ speech)? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]