Search for: "UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, et al., U.S. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
PEPPER ET AL., case number 17-204, the United States Supreme Court considered a case alleging Apple has monopolized the retail market for the sale of apps and has unlawfully used its monopolistic power to charge consumers higher-than competitive prices. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Following Recent Cases in Media Law at the European Court of Human Rights, van der Hof et al. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
UPMC HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – February 7th, 2019) involves a claim alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:18 am
Blockvest LLC et al., case number 3:18-cv-02287, denied the SEC’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction to enjoin Blockvest’s ICO on the SEC’s claim that Blockvest’s pre-ICO capital raising was a securities law violation. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Ironically, the hack into the EDGAR database, which was also the subject of testimony from SEC Chairman Jay Clayton before the Senate Banking Committee brought the SEC’s previously quiet but steadfast outsider trading foray into the spotlight. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:39 pm
Daniels, et al., No. 17-2023, p. 16, — F.3d – (3d. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:17 pm
[i] In the fall of 2017, the SEC commenced three separate enforcement actions against individuals and defendants seeking to conduct ICOs (i.e., SEC v PlexCorps et al., SEC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm
Regulation Best Interest is, in large part, a response to the highly-criticized Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule (the “DOL Fiduciary Rule”), which was vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on March 15, 2018 (see Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A., et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing Williams v Sprint/United Management Comp [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:38 am
(United States, et al., v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:07 am
The case is United States, et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
