Search for: "UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS"
Results 41 - 60
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
United States and California (Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00167) (previous HL Pulse discussion here). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:09 am
Department of Revenue of Illinois), which held that under the Constitution, states could not require businesses to collect sales tax unless they had a physical presence in the state. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm
July 23, 2018) (putative class action removed from state court to federal court alleging defendants, which meter and measure water and sewer utility for individual units in multi-unit complexes, overcharged plaintiffs for their use of water and sewer utilities in violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and other state law) Pryor, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
; State Revenue Department websites; Bloomberg BNA. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Illinois Department of Revenue and 1992’s Quill Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Illinois Department of Revenue. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
” Article II, Section 2 provides that the “President shall…have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am
Last year, the Commerce Department said Americans spent $456 billion in ecommerce retail purchases, an amount equal to 13 percent of all retails sales in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
Illinois Department of Revenue, leaves them in place, or does something in between, “Congress can act. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:46 am
Illinois Department of Revenue, which also involved mail-order sales, the court ruled that a “seller whose only connection with customers in the state is by common carrier or the United States mail” lacked the requisite minimum contacts with the state to justify “impos[ing] the burdens” of collecting taxes on interstate sales. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
