Search for: "UNIVERSAL AM CAN LTD V ATTORNEY GENERAL "
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 2:25 am
Similarly, Combined Insurance Group Ltd v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
They can take advantage of the status-based civil immunity that the Texas Supreme Court has seen fit to grant them, and can even benefit from their crimes. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
" See also Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm
" Agudath Israel of Am. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Star Wars producer Lucasfilm fails to win damages over unauthorised replicas of stormtrooper helmets - EWCA decision in Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Trademark Blog) (Class 99) USPTO releases patent pendency simulation tool -… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: PTO Director Jon Dudas announces resignation (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) (Patent Prospector) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Can accused infringers finally escape Marshall? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
When Canadian Courts Cite the Major Philosophers: Who Cites Whom in Canadian Caselaw Queen’s University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-090; CLLR 42:2 Nancy McCormack is an Associate Professor and Law Librarian at Queen’s University. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
” Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Am. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Am. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 9 July 2019 Sharp P and Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Yaxley-Lennon [2019] EWHC 1791 (QB). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
The Parkers sought restitution of the lost value to the trust, damages based on gains of a suitable portfolio over the same period, and attorney's fees. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
See Wedgetail, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 4:06 pm
In Case T-135/08, Schniga GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office, with interveners Elaris SNC and Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, also dating back to last Monday, the General Court annulled the Office's ruling that a plant variety right should not have been granted for its Gala Schnitzer apple (left) in that the applicant Shniga had failed to comply with requirements made in its individual case. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
In his overview, Barca pointed to the Attorney-General’s recent speech at City University London, and this extract: As I said earlier, it is my belief that hitherto the press has been pushing at the boundaries and in a sense has subtly been seeking to explore what is or isn’t acceptable. [read post]
