Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION" Results 21 - 40 of 904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 2:13 am by Nedim Malovic
Nor should links that are copied and pasted in various posts on Facebook and/or Twitter be subject to the injunction. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm by Rick Garnett
The author of this post, however, is not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:39 am by Eric
Consumer Depot * Note about Tricome v. eBay * Note about Universal Grading Service v. eBay * eBay User Agreement Upheld, Part II--Durick v. eBay * eBay User Agreement Upheld--Nazaruk v. eBay (upheld on appeal) [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Professions v State of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 50084(U), Supreme Court, Albany County A faculty member in the collective bargaining unit represented by United University Professions (UUP) employed by a unit of the State University of New York [SUNY] was suspended without pay pending the resolution of certain charges of misconduct filed against him. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
 This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
From the New York Review of Books: "'Selma' v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:08 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Re council tax exemption, in London there are many universities falling under different local authorities and hence students have to comply with the relevant council/university method for confirming their student status. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am by Léon Dijkman
Therefore, as also indirectly confirmed by the District Court of the Hague’s decision in Sisvel v Xiaomi, the need for a higher degree of scrutiny on essentiality claims is crucially important. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But then: “Nominative fair use by a defendant makes it ‘clear to consumers that the plaintiff, not the defendant, is the source of the trademarked product or service’” (citing Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]