Search for: "UP-262 - State v. Williams" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 1:11 pm by David Bernstein
Klarman, From Jim Crow to Civil Rights 262 (2004); William A. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sys. v Allyn, 262 AD2d 351, 351 (2d Dept 1999); see also Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v Mitchell, 63 AD3d 447, 448 (1st Dept 2009). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
” In one place, the Williams study states it looked at a cohort of 868,912 veterans with exposure to Agent Orange, and evaluated bladder cancer outcomes against outcomes in 2,427,677 matched controls. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
Co., 287 AD2d 699; see generally Chemical Bank v City of Jamestown, 122 AD2d 530; Guberman v William Penn Life Ins. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on William N. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
  The judge took up Coscia’s arguments in the order given above, beginning with the “spoofing” charge. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
Justice Thomas’s statement, while the voice of only one Supreme Court justice, is especially concerning in light of President Trump’s aspiration to “open up the libel laws,” which seems to be aimed at overruling Sullivan. [read post]