Search for: "UPS v. Department of Revenue" Results 1 - 20 of 1,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
This may increase revenue for the department, but any revenue increase is expected to be minimal. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Second, when the legislature enacted the State Budget, it adopted Conference Committee Amendment No. 9,  “funds appropriated for the purpose of final development and submission of energy use intensity targets and standards regulations to the Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and Legislative Review may not be expended until the Maryland Department of the Environment submits .. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:12 pm by ACLU
The Kansas Department of Revenue, which issues driver’s licenses, declined to change its policy — prompting Kobach to sue KDOR to force a policy change in Kansas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Harbir Deol
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have the ability to pursue cases of willful non-compliance. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This is an unavoidable question; as OpenAI noted in a public comment, it is impossible to create generative AI tools without use of copyright-protected content.[2]  This post addresses a follow up question:  whether, in light of what’s noted thus far, copyright law requires AI model builders to license all such content, and thus whether a mandatory licensing scheme to enable fair exchange of value between creators of protected content and the AI model builders is… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm by NARF
Arizona Department of Revenue (White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
As such, they should not face the difficulties and – bluntly put – resistance that, instead, they have been encountering across multiple national courts.The recent and somewhat ‘twin’ decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo (decision 5700/2023) and RTI v V Kontakte (decision 14531/2023) are examples of both a misunderstanding and misapplication of CJEU case law, notably the 2021 judgment in YouTube, C-682/18 and C-683/18 [IPKat… [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
In a follow-up post yesterday, on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, Mikhail posted a correction, indicating that he meant to refer to Section 788: In my post on Monday, I wrote "789" instead of "788" when referring to the section of Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833) in which Story refers to the President and Vice President as officers of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 12 and 13 February 2024 there was an application in the case of Webster -v- Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs QB-2021-003999. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]