Search for: "US v. Daniel Holmes" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2005, 9:40 pm
In what has to be one of the more interesting post-Booker opinions, Chief Judge Holmes of the Northern District of Oklahoma who, post-Blakely, gave us US v. [read post]
16 Aug 2004, 9:20 pm
August 13, 2004)Chief Judge Holmes follows the same approach he followed in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
“The time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of The Supreme Court,” a young professor of law at the University of Wisconsin named Mark V. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Judge Holmes further noted that Nacchio had not sustained his burden on the methodology used by Fischel. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
On the Daubert issue, the only one on which the Court reverses the Nacchio verdict, it ironically relies on a case (Goebel v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
In this particular case, Judge Holmes held that the reputation of Daniel Fischel, a preeminent scholar in the law and economics movement, and his track record of testifying in other cases was not of itself sufficient to establish his methodology. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Nacchio of his key expert witness, Professor Daniel Fischel. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:07 pm by kate
Justice Holmes again argued that the First Amendment does not “give immunity for every possible use of language. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by James Bickford
”  At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost views Snyder in the context of Justice Holmes’s 1929 dissent in Schwimmer v. [read post]