Search for: "US, et al v. Reid" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
 Gallot et al., 2011[17]2012 9Pomegranate seeds (frozen)CanadaEgyptSuspect product contamination before export. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Perhaps the Supreme Court will limit itself to deciding the relatively benign question of required procedures, parsing constitutional text and arguments in the standard manner.[23] Except that recent history suggests that the Court might instead use SEC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
We spotted the Brief for American Historical Association et al. as Amici Curiae cited on page 4 (h/t Gautham Rao, Maggie Blackhawk). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
One downstream recall from a company that may have used strawberries linked to this outbreak to make a product has been initiated. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
In the pre-vaccine era, the primary methods used for preventing HAV infections were hygienic measures and passive protection with immune globulin (IG). [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by bndmorris
Herrera, Amber Baylor, et al., Evaluating Legal Needs, 36 Notre Dame J.L. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Senate had ratified an international gun control treaty, "No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints in the Constitution" Reid v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]