Search for: "US Cable Holdings LP"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Astrazeneca Pharms., LP, 500 F. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 6:53 am
On March 10, Atrium Hospitality LP entered into a consent decree with the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Third, VF Jeanswear LP v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Barry, No. 19-414 (when is a process-invention “ready for patenting” so that a public use or offer to sell would create a bar to patentability) Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc, often referred to as the Cablevision case. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
His antitrust opinions, certain other competition matters, and a closely related dispute over the Obama net neutrality rule betray an ideological, anti-regulatory activist, willing to take bits and pieces of precedent and use them to change the law as he likes. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:50 pm
Copyright Act, the compulsory license for the use of compositions. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 5:00 pm
In The Brick Warehouse LP v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
The skimmers are described as a black hard plaster square block with connection cables to the card reader and key pad of the gas pump attached to the pump with double sided tape. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:11 am
On the same day, DISH — apparently seeking the protection of the then more favorable Second Circuit authority, including Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
However, the Court took care to say that its ruling was limited to an interpretation of the Copyright Act’s Transmit Clause, which the Court said was intended to apply “to cable companies and their equivalents, [and] did not intend to discourage or to control the emergence or use of different kinds of technologies. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
CCS Holdings, Inc., a 2008 decision by a panel of the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
CCS Holdings, Inc., a 2008 decision by a panel of the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
CCS Holdings, Inc., a 2008 decision by a panel of the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:24 pm
Indeed, the Court specifically stated that it did not believe its “limited holding” would “discourage” or “control the emergence or use of different kinds of technologies. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F. 3d 121 (2008) that considered subscriber ordered copying of content a private act that does not violate copyright law. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008) (“Cablevision”), which found that a cable company’s remote-storage DVR system did not run afoul of the public performance right because each transmission was sent only to an individual user. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
There is further evidence that Congress did not intend for the language of the public performance provisions to explain the distinction between cable services and antenna rental services. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
However, strictly applying that strict liability to reproductions occurring in cyberspace “would hold the entire Internet liable for activities that cannot reasonably be deterred. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
The clause was introduced against a backdrop of expanding cable networks and was accompanied by a licensing scheme for retransmission via cable. [read post]
