Search for: "US FIRE INSURANCE CO" Results 81 - 100 of 2,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am by admin
A representative of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., the largest home insurer in the U.S., came to the charred remnants of Tunnell’s home to tell her the company would pay just $220,000 of the estimated $306,000 cost of rebuilding the house. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The State Attorney General was investigating whether insurance brokers were steering clients toward particular insurance carriers. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:37 am by Alexandra Allan
In Sea Glory Maritime Co v Al Sagr National Insurance Co (The Nancy) [2013] EWHC 2116 (Comm), the First Claimant (the vessel’s registered owner) and Second Claimant (a party representing itself as the vessel’s commercial and technical manager) sought an indemnity under a policy of marine insurance taken out with the Defendant. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Mead was insured by Lexington and National Union Fire Insurance Co. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
  The use of the racketeering statute is a new tactic for attorneys pursuing Katrina-related claims against insurance companies. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm by Rachel Tischler and Nicole Zolla*
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 26 N.Y.3d 659 (Feb. 18, 2016), involved the interplay of three statutes—the FAA, which establishes a federal policy in favor of enforcing arbitration agreements; the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which establishes a federal policy in favor of state regulation of insurance; and California Insurance Code § 11658, which requires workers’ compensation insurers of California employers to… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:28 am
COMMERCIAL AUTO - PERMISSIVE USE - COINSURANCE - CONTRIBUTION AMONG COINSURERS - NOTICE TO EXCESS INSURER - "SAVINGS CLAUSE" National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:21 pm
In Manitoba, the law with respect to "use or operation" of an automobile in the context of no-fault insurance has not been changed by the recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions of Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. [read post]