Search for: "US Inventor" Results 121 - 140 of 8,226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm by Robert Plotkin
Stephen Thaler’s “Artificial Inventor” project’s attempts to obtain patents on devices generated using his neural network-based DABUS software. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm by Robert Plotkin
Stephen Thaler’s “Artificial Inventor” project’s attempts to obtain patents on devices generated using his neural network-based DABUS software. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:36 am by Richard Marsolais
Follow us on LinkedIn at: https://bit.ly/3S0vc3y Richard Marsolais is the Business Development Director at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Resources are finite and so we make choices to use those resources. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:14 am by Chiara Gallo
While the New Year is approaching, let’s look back at what you might have missed last week.PatentsImage by Riana HarveyRose Hughes discussed the recent Board of Appeal decision in T 2172/21, which highlights the inadequacy of mere lists of various features for satisfying the basic requirements in Europe.Rose Hughes reviewed the EPO Boards of Appeal decisions and case law.Henry P Yang reported on the breaking news of the UK Supreme Court’s confirmation that an inventor under the… [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:36 am by Dennis Crouch
   There was a roughly parallel shift when looking at the % of patents naming a US inventor — up from 47% in 2022 to 50% in 2023. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Barry Sookman
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems and in particular generative AI (GenAI) systems have raised the question as to whether technical advances in the useful arts or synthetic content generated using these tools can qualify for patent or copyright protection. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Rose Hughes
  Bad cases make bad law: Has DABUS "the AI inventor" actually invented anything? [read post]
The court used case law authorities to interpret the meaning and scope of an “inventor,” and found that the only reasonable interpretation is that the inventor must be a “natural person” “who came up with the inventive concept. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:00 am by Audrey A Millemann
I think I’d rather stick with the traditional stockings and deal with the problems the inventor identifies. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:34 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Recent research has, for example, shown that women and people of color are underrepresented among patent-seeking inventors and among lawyers and agents at the PTO. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Recent research has, for example, shown that women and people of color are underrepresented among patent-seeking inventors and among lawyers and agents at the PTO. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Vidal, the US was able to hang its decision on a single definition of the word “inventor” — holding that the term unambiguously means only natural persons based on express provisions defining inventor as an “individual” 35 U.S.C. 100(f). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:09 am by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
Among other things, a patent application must have enough details to show that the inventors actually invented what they claim to invent and enough details to teach others to make and use their invention. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Even claims that use a robust mix of structure and function are now vulnerable. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:40 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In other words, ownership of the invention precedes and takes precedence over ownership of the patent itself, which explains why the inventor is the first holder of the right (an assignment to the applicant is presumed (according to Articles 60 and 81 of the EPC) and why the inventor can claim ownership of the invention that has been stolen from him. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by thomasgalvani
You can attempt to change any of the following in an amendment after the notice of allowance: an amendment to the specification; a change in the drawings; an amendment to the claims; a change in the inventorship; the submission of prior art; a request to correct the spelling of an inventor’s name; and a request to change the order of the names of the inventors. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:20 am by Evan Lim
Medtronics filed five IPR petitions using the ’355 patent as the primary prior art reference under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:52 am by zola.support.team
They give the inventor exclusive rights to use their invention for a certain period. [read post]