Search for: "US Securities and Exchange Commission v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm
Varjabedian (April 15): In a lawsuit alleging violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether a private plaintiff has to show that a person who made a false statement intended to do so, or whether it is enough that the false statement was made negligently Parker Drilling Management Services v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
Somers, in which the court ruled that the anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not apply to a whistleblower who has not first reported a violation to the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether the SEC can seek disgorgement of profits as a judicial remedy for violating the securities-fraud laws, and Opati v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In exchange, he allegedly used his influence to protect three businesspeople and benefit the government of Egypt. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) found former State Street Vice President Vincent DeBaggis entered into an agreement with Amer Ahmad, then Ohio deputy treasurer, to make illegal cash payments and political contributions. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At UPI, Michael Kirkland reports on a proposed Securities and Exchange Commission regulation designed to “undo at least some of the effects” of the Court’s opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) traditional test for determining whether a transaction qualifies as a security—the Howey test—is problematic for cryptocurrencies. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Moreover, this rule hasn’t been substantively updated since 2000.[11] Thus, I’ve asked staff to make recommendations for the Commission’s consideration around how we might update Rule 605 so that investors receive more useful disclosure about order execution quality. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
The Parkers asserted that IB's acts and omissions, involving an extreme degree of risk, were grossly negligent, IB had actual awareness of the risk involved, but proceeded with conscious indifference, and IB had violated the Texas Securities Act.[3] The Parkers claimed that IB's breaches of duty had caused them a loss of $725,779 and IB had profited $44,807 in commissions, fees, and interest. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
In Smith, the Court held that the Religion Clauses did not preclude the state from denying unemployment benefits to two members of the Native American Church who were fired for using peyote, even though this use was for religious purposes. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Although it is a Canadian rather than a US decision, the very similar thinking displayed by a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Ontario in Baglow v Smith 2011 ONSC 5131 provides a further indication of a developing exceptionalism surrounding online publication in the common law world. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
On the anniversary of that attack, the Department of Homeland Security warned that calls for violent action against lawmakers were picking up steam online. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:36 am
More importantly, the Second Circuit stated, the conclusion in Sacks is no longer tenable following the Supreme Court’s decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
