Search for: "US Steel Corp. v. DOUGLAS" Results 21 - 23 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
But their use by states has also been criticized for inhibiting the construction of robust internal and global markets, in part because of their inefficiency,[16] and in part where such open and robust markets serve as the foundation of economic activity within and beyond states.[17] The difficulty stems from their relationship to the entity that both owns them and regulates them. [read post]
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]