Search for: "US v. Andrew Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm by Shima Baradaran
Jones case (ie the GPS case that said that attaching a GPS tracker and using that devise to monitor a car is a “search” under the Fourth Amendment). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Chris Seaton
Perhaps the DC Court of appeals finally helped us achieve true intersectionality with its holding in Prince Jones v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:32 pm
Jones-was released at the end of January, agents were ordered to stop using GPS devices immediately and told to await guidance on retrieving the devices, FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann said in a recent talk at a University of San Francisco conference. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:37 am by Orin Kerr
Jones — and specifically the majority opinion for the DC Circuit (under the name United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
Note: Following the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Jones v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:37 am by Jay Stanley
At the time of the Jones decision, the FBI had 3,000 GPS devices in use. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:00 am by Dan Gauss
Even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s January decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Jeff Welty
Jones, 565 U.S. __ (2012), and regarding cell phone searches incident to arrest in Riley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:41 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Although Jones was a major victory for privacy, it also left a host of unanswered questions about the proper use of surveillance technologies going forward. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Stephen Reilly and Andrew Jones of Beale & Company Solicitors take a look at the possibilities and prospects for data breach class actions in the U.K. [read post]