Search for: "US v. Anthony Sellers"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 4:18 pm
* Anthony v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
Cty., Aug. 31, 2011), where the plaintiff, a seller of home appliances, sued Alfred Little and Seeking Alpha, Ltd. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
The decided case was Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:59 pm
”) A few years ago, the states got their hopes up when Justice Anthony M. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
One of these is the South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:30 am
In 2015, Justice Anthony Kennedy (who voted for the result in Quill) used his concurrence in a different tax case to explicitly invite a case like Wayfair, stating that “[t]he legal system should find an appropriate case for this court to re-examine Quill. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
The Sullivan Cases Abernathy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm
Two years ago, however, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
But would the use of "faux fur" by sellers of real fur be vulnerable to such an action? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
Oracle, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Distinguishing Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
However, the proposed regulations specify the method BSEE will use to enforce accrued decommissioning obligations against “predecessors. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
Congress, despite enduring the intense lobbying of the recording industry not to take action, did finally raise the US statutory mechanical rate in 1978 under the “new” US Copyright Act of 1976. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
The seller can be liable for rescission or damages. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
[iii] Nick Petrillo, IBISWorld Industry Report OD5447 Online Event Ticket Sales in the US, IBISWORLD, (2016). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Louis V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
He just wanted there to be a reliable registry.CAH: So sellers wanted to have a better idea of whether a mark they wanted to use was owned by someone else, but the 1905 Act's route to registering was needlessly complicated, not mandatory, and it didn't add any real incentive to entice trademark owners to register. [read post]
