Search for: "US v. Antoine Laws" Results 81 - 100 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 1:16 pm by Taryn Rucinski
Environmental water : advances in treatment, remediation and recycling / V. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:25 pm by seo
”  Those of us who regularly deal with search and seizure issues in the context of criminal law pay particular attention to trends in our court system that periodically change the outlook of this area of the law. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
Zoe Tillman of the Blog of Legal Times reports that Antoine Jones, the defendant in last Term’s GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Dignified Law: The Role of Human Dignity in European Convention Case-Law, Antoine Buyse, keynote delivered on 11 October 2016, at Utrecht University Online Intermediary Liability and Privacy in India. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
(credit for NASA drawing above of GPS satellite)In the case under review, Antoine Jones, a nightclub owner in Washington DC, had been convicted of drugs offences. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:02 am by Krekor
“The concurrence begins by accusing us of applying ’18th-century tort law,’ ” Scalia wrote. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am by SHG
Via Doug Berman’s Sentencing Law and Policy, Southern District of West Virginia Judge Joseph Goodwin took a very strong, very controversial stand against plea bargains in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Rund testified at sentencing that he no longer uses alcohol. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011): Court of Appeal: By 2-1 majority (Lord Justice Laws dissenting) Ban on tobacco sales through automatic vending machines was lawful. [read post]