Search for: "US v. Austin, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
McCraw, Director, Texas Department Of Public Safety, et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
Bambauer, Saura Masconale, et. al., Reckless Associations, 36 Harv. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
The Austin Court of Appeals has ruled in Texas Railroad Commission et al v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
Microsoft asks the court to adjudge its motion to dismiss regardless of any commitments not to close the deal before a given date.Here's Microsoft's motion, filed late Tuesday afternoon Pacific Time:De Martini et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:32 am
Stross v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Malapportionment is also associated with disparate allocation of government resources in favor of overrepresented areas (Baker and Dinkin 1997; Ansolabehere et al. 2002; Horiuchi and Saito 2003; Gibson et al. 2004; Bruhn et al. 2010; Maaser and Stratmann 2016) and less progressive tax structures that reinforce economic inequality (Ardanaz and Scartascini 2013). [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Finding Consensus Cheng tells us that his Consensus Rule would look something like: “Rule 702A. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The urn model of probability, however, gives us some insight into attributability. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 1:22 pm
Cartwright et al — in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Orlando Division as part of its efforts to help restore free speech and expression for American college students and reinforce the need for academic discourse in higher education. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
” This is a well-used but always corrupt pro-censorship tautology, i.e., “We’re not regulating what content the defendant publishes. [read post]
