Search for: "US v. Brown" Results 161 - 180 of 8,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2021, 10:00 am by Ezra Rosser
Summary below: Using the case study of Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO, Inc. v. de Blasio, a lawsuit challenging New York City’s class-based policies to diversify its elite Specialized High Schools, this Essay explains that purported support for class-based affirmative action serves as a rhetorical smokescreen for eliminating Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 6:07 am by Jon L. Gelman
The US Supreme Court has placed Cassens Transport Co., et al., Petitioners v, Paul Brown, et al., No. 08-1375 on its conference agenda for December 4, 2009. [read post]
On March 5, 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to constitute an en banc panel to reconsider a decision issued by the court in Trek Leather Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:53 am
In a strictly worded memorandum, Ontario Superior Court Justice David Brown says “tactical gamesmanship” by parties has no place in courtrooms funded by public resources.Brown is managing a multi-party commercial dispute that has seen an avalanche of materials and numerous motions but no trial since starting six years ago.The proceedings in Ruggedcom Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:12 am
Here are the actual results:The first case is U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Shea Denning
  To determine the reasonableness of a checkpoint, the court must engage in the balancing test formulated in Brown v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:32 am by Wally Zimolong
 The New Old Test In Browning Ferris, the Board returned to the test the Board applied to joint employer cases before 1984 and as was articulated by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in another case ironically involving Browning Ferris,  NLRB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Elliott, the South Carolina companion case to Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 10:02 pm by Brian Leiter
Following up on yesterday's post, this NYT article makes clear that "color blindness" was not the point of Brown v. [read post]