Search for: "US v. Burrell" Results 1 - 20 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Waterman filed Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum in Shirley Frazier Burrell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 11:22 pm
Of note on account of the fact that it pitches one seasoned manipulator of the media against another is Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch),  a High Court, Chancery Division, decision from England and Wales, delivered by Mr Justice Mann on Monday of this week. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Of note on account of the fact that it pitches one seasoned manipulator of the media against another is Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch),  a High Court, Chancery Division, decision from England and Wales, delivered by Mr Justice Mann on 25 June 2015. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Waterman refiled a medical malpractice suit in Circuit Court for the City of Newport News, Virginia, captioned Shirley Frazier Burrell v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Burrell also points to a related result in Musidor BV v Tansing (1994) 52 FCR 363 (Federal Court of Australia – Full Court) (use of “The Rolling Stones” on the cover of lawful but unauthorized sound recordings was legitimate). [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
On November 12, 15 and 19, 2012, first, second and third Final Pre-Trial Conferences were held in Shirley Frazier Burrell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:30 pm
Dean Jim Chen, over at MoneyLaw's hall of doom headquarter's, has responded to my post about tenure and Pat Burrell. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 19 February 2016, judgment was handed down in the case of Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 pm
Since filing that patient fall lawsuit, Plaintiff has resumed her pre-marital name, Shirley Frazier Burrell. 1. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Robert Burrell: heritage brand cases in Australia, some of which produce really undesirable results. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:58 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 94304 (WD TN, July 20, 2016), a Tennessee federal district court, while dismissing a number of claims, allowed a Nation of Islam inmate to move ahead with his complaint that pork meals are being served in the non-pork food line, that he is allergic to the food being served as  a pork replacement, and he has been refused passes for religious services when hi uses his Nation of Islam name to sign up.In Burrell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile, the Guardian has reported that Paul Burrell and James Hewitt have issued phone hacking claims against the Mirror newspapers. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Burrell: proving infringement is expensive; people used to register in the UK under the old system. [read post]