Search for: "US v. Butterworth"
Results 21 - 40
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
In her discussion of the recent decision in Metropolitan Schools v Designtechnica ([2010] EWHC 2411 (QB)) – posted by us on 30 October – Siobhain Butterworth draws attention to the oddity of the case. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
Troy’s argument that Samson used Mr. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:29 pm
Two-Way Media v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
of a Butterworths Conference fortuitously titled "International High-Technology Patent Litigation", which is coming up somewhere in London on 27 September. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm
This legislation is unnecessary – since the 1992 case of Matusevitch v Telnikoff it has been clear that the US courts will not enforce foreign libel judgments where the local law does not apply US First Amendment standards. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
I believe that the oldest use of media other than print to teach legal research was a videotape with voice-over by Stephen Borins back in the academic year, 1970-1971 in which he ran through a legal research problem which touched on Priestman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:12 pm
The five cases this time around include * Siemens v VIPA (European Court of Justice): a ruling on whether a business had taken unfair advantage of the reputation of the distinguishing marks of Siemens' Simatic product range by using Siemens' stock code numbers as part of its own stock numbers for compatible products.* MIP METRO Group v OHIM (Court of First Instance): a salutary tale of what can happen if a party opposing a Community trade mark application fails… [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:24 am
Elite agreed that its product had used the known three point Atlas warp knit stitch pattern, but pressed ahead nonetheless.Left: another example of mesh used as bait ...Judge Michael Fysh QC dismissed the infringement claim. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:28 am
In last week’s case (Moore v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
Do join us. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:50 pm
If you want to help Duncan in this exciting adventure, email him here with news of the litigation in your jurisdiction.Right: chocks away, as Duncan "Biggles" Bucknell" flies off around the world to service his clientele's international interestsOther scorecards on Duncan's website list the current state of play in the US v Czech Budweiser dispute (here), Ranbaxy's battle with Pfizer over Lipitor (here) and the Eli Lilly/Teva/Dr Reddy's fight over… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
The IPKat is bursting to read this in full on BAILII, since this posting-- based on a LexisNexis Butterworth note -- has stimulated his appetite to know more. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Burlington, MA Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:29 am
In Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and another [2008] EWHC 2078 (Pat), not yet available on BAILII but noted with extreme brevity by LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription service, Mr Justice Floyd has returned to an issue that is mentioned in his earlier decision in June -- the necessity (or otherwise) of Markem being given injunctive relief in respect of an undertaking which, Zipher had argued, was not really an undertaking not to amend one of its patents but a mere… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:18 am
Butterworth, 701 So. 2d 76 (Fla.1997); Johnston v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
There may well be other cases rejecting presumed reliance claims that we didn't find if they didn't use the magic words "fraud on the market. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
” Events No events for next week have been reported to us. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:15 pm
Merpel agrees, but adds that sometimes it is quite possible to work out the identity of the concealed celebrity - as happened to the unfortunate footballer in one of the cases cited in this judgment, A v B.Right Mann for the jobHesco Bastion Ltd v TFL Defence Ltd and others, decided yesterday in the Chancery Division, is a ruling of Judge Martin Mann QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, the IPKat found a note on it on LexisNexis Butterworths. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
The well-known and much used defence arises from the 1999 case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers in which the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) extended the defence of qualified privilege to cover the media. [read post]
