Search for: "US v. Claybrooks"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm
“In support of its decision, the court invoked a 1995 Supreme Court case, Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 2:27 pm
Instead, the court must explicitly state its drug quantity finding, id., and provide "some description of the reliable evidence used to support the finding and the method used to calculate it," Claybrooks, 729 F.3d at 707. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 6:54 pm
Supreme Court's February decision in Riegel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
This was in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
The statutory definition of bona fide occupational qualification expressly excludes race,[13] but producers and directors are nonetheless protected by the First Amendment in their race-based casting, as is made clear by Claybrooks v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Claybrooks, 90 F.4th 248 (Jan. 4, 2024) In this case from the Middle District of North Carolina, the defendant pled guilty to possession of a stolen firearm. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Using such terms to refer to one's commercial choices does not create a First Amendment right to contract, or not to contract. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
Preparing for his role in Melton v. [read post]
