Search for: "US v. Cole" Results 1 - 20 of 1,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by emp
Last week saw a flurry of reports about the case of R. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:52 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — Failure to state a claim In 2005, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Ronnell Cole, appellant, was convicted of second-degree murder, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun. ... [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Martin Kratz
Cole to use his work-issued laptop for personal purposes. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:36 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Court of Appeal has recently given us a useful reminder of some of the basic principles in the case of Ghadami & Ghadami v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
   ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v MYRIAD GENETICS – an isolated decision? [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
She said: What it means is her loyal fans who may be camping out to see if she is OK after the US X Factor fiasco and may snap a quick photo may also be caught out by the terms of the order. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm by Kevin Walsh
Cole as a referendum on “the integrity of the undue burden framework as a compromise” shaped by moderate judges in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:54 pm by Orin Kerr
I suspect that difference leads us to talk past each other a bit. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
My colleague, Jessica Grant, kindly wrote the following summary of the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
Cole explains in a Washington Post op-ed, Laptops v. [read post]
They argued that providing opportunities to only these students discriminated on the basis of race, violating the US Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and running afoul of the US Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]