Search for: "US v. Daniel Holmes"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
They may enable us to get a keener insight into our society and its problems. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:13 pm
Think, for example, of Marshall v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost views Snyder in the context of Justice Holmes’s 1929 dissent in Schwimmer v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 7:27 am
Patent No. 6,070,946 entitled DUAL WHEEL MOUNTING SYSTEM and owned by James Holmes. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 7:27 am
Patent No. 6,070,946 entitled DUAL WHEEL MOUNTING SYSTEM and owned by James Holmes. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:52 am
VentureBeat is reporting that a settlement has been reached in the Zynga v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Nearly three years after the US Supreme Court found that carbon dioxide was a pollutant that fell under the purview of the Clean Air Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency has agreed to explore approaches for tightening its regulations dealing with ocean acidification under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:22 am
Holmes Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Click Here UN climate science head hopes for more US action. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
In this particular case, Judge Holmes held that the reputation of Daniel Fischel, a preeminent scholar in the law and economics movement, and his track record of testifying in other cases was not of itself sufficient to establish his methodology. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Nacchio of his key expert witness, Professor Daniel Fischel. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Judge Holmes further noted that Nacchio had not sustained his burden on the methodology used by Fischel. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
On the Daubert issue, the only one on which the Court reverses the Nacchio verdict, it ironically relies on a case (Goebel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Coolidge and Daniel H. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Ireland Vindicated 1 v. (1847) O'Connell, Daniel. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:50 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2005, 9:40 pm
In what has to be one of the more interesting post-Booker opinions, Chief Judge Holmes of the Northern District of Oklahoma who, post-Blakely, gave us US v. [read post]
16 Aug 2004, 9:20 pm
August 13, 2004)Chief Judge Holmes follows the same approach he followed in U.S. v. [read post]
