Search for: "US v. David Spence" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
At that time, the lead investigator, state police Detective David Aresco, asked the defendant if he could explain why the state police were in his home. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Berkeley case on behalf of seven law professors: our own William Boyd, Dan Farber and Sharon Jacobs at UC Berkeley, Jim Rossi at Vanderbilt, David Spence at UT Austin, Shelley Welton at UPenn, and Hannah Wiseman at Penn State. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:33 pm by Rumpole
Speaking of Twitter, we broke the news today of the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Voting Rights for Non-Residents at Issue in Frank v CanadaShould apologies be admissible in court? [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:57 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Harper government names a slew of new federal judges, but none for Ontario despite 31 vacanciesThe evolution of fraudulent conveyance – Indcondo v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:48 am by Rumpole
(For the US view on forced sterilizations, and Oliver Wendell Holmes majority opinion that "three generations of imbeciles are enough" , check out Buck v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Early Republic Borderlands: Indian Removal, Slavery, and Non-State ActorsChair: David Waldstreicher, Temple University  “Fraught with Disastrous Consequences for our Country”: Cherokee Removal and Nullification, 1824–1839, Nancy Morgan, Temple University  Women at the Crossroads: The Legal and Political Fight to Reverse Indian Removal in Seneca, 1838–1887, Taylor Spence, Yale University Reading Hearts, Not Books: Affective Literacy and Public… [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
” Alex Spence at Buzzfeed has uncovered the fact that the Telegraph hired Sir David Eady, who they described as “the judge who stops us from knowing the truth,” to conduct a secret internal inquiry. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
A Shift in the Energy Regulatory Regime Monday, July 18, 2016  | David Spence The Supreme Court’s decisions in this term’s energy cases—Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n v. [read post]