Search for: "US v. Davy Wyatt"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court wrote in Davis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Martin Davie, Reflections of an Anglican Theologian: Would a Provincial solution require Parliamentary approval? [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 10:51 am
Korrell of Seattle's Davis Wright Tremaine. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am
” At the Sixth Amendment Center, David Carroll surveys state practices relating to the use of non-lawyer judges in criminal cases, an issue presented in Davis v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Thus, this column asks (with its usual objectivity): Can the SEC, Wyatt Earp, and the other Good Guys win this shootout? [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Does the fact that a defendant was involved in political activity using campaign funds affect the analysis? [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
