Search for: "US v. Doctor"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
Hilton The post Saga Continues in Case Arising from South Carolina Malpractice Actions of Impostor “Doctor” – Agape Senior Primary Care, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
Yates v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Mahoney v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 9:32 am
Polukoff v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Defendant claims that the original doctor, in sum and substance, gave the same rationale for lack of medical necessity as was testified to by the second doctor since he mentioned the same factors and rationale albeit without using the talismanic phrase "generally accepted medical standards. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:09 am
In Greek v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:38 am
Patty v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 7:04 am
Brandner v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
Having made progress with securing legal representation for Doctors in many cases using R (G) v Governors of X School [2010] EWCA Civ 1 the relevant organizations turned their attention to getting independent Tribunals to hear disciplinary charges against Doctors in the workplace. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
The patient in Adams v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Burke V. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 11:06 am
In the recent Florida eye doctor medical malpractice lawsuit of Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:48 am
Councils must not shelter behind doctors Shala v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Specifically a life-sized replica of The TARDIS from Doctor Who which had been used in the couple’s themed wedding was placed in the driveway of their home. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
With the Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:34 am
Salaam v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:25 am
In Muniz v. [read post]
Report Highlights Sexual Harassment, Abuse of Patients by Doctors in New York and Around the Country
8 Jul 2016, 9:57 am
Sessa v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:26 am
In Rosebrock v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:53 am
For example, an Illinois judge recently reviewed the circumstances under which doctor-patient privilege is waived; Flowers v. [read post]
