Search for: "US v. Eric Morrison" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 1:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
Even if it’s a bit surprising that he said the quiet part out loud, it shouldn’t come as any great shock that Judge Brett Kavanaugh thinks the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  First, the claimants in group litigation claim of against Morrisons Supermarket successfully established that the defendant was vicariously liable for a data leak (Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
By Eric Goldman Copyright * A lot of action on whether "making available" a file in a P2P share directory is copyright infringement, including Elektra v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:34 am by James Hamilton
Eric Pan, an Academic Fellow in the Office of International Affairs, discussed the US Supreme Court’s Morrison opinion and the SEC study mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act on the extraterritorial reach of US securities laws, particularly the antifraud rule. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Proxy season, SEC, SPACs Top 5 SEC Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Proxy season, SEC, SPACs Top 5 SEC Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
In Nichols v City of Taft, the Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that the use of a fee multiplier to compensate for the higher hourly rates of out-of-town counsel requires a sufficient showing -- which the Nichols failed to make -- that hiring local counsel was "impracticable. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner assert that the removal would be improper if it was done for improper motives: namely “personal, pecuniary, or purely partisan ends. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:18 am by WSLL
Olson, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
US District Court Judge Morrison England ("Great name! [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  He handed down judgment on 14 May 2018, dismissing the appeal ([2018] EWHC 1201 (QB)) On 16 May 2018 Langstaff J handed down judgment on costs in Various Claimants v Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC [2018] EWHC 1123 (QB). [read post]