Search for: "US v. Floyd"
Results 1 - 20
of 813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Was the “neck hold” that Chauvin used, even though Floyd was in handcuffs, legal? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:29 pm
Gilda Day v Floyd County School District by julie9094 The Rome Tribune featured in the news today that Williams Oinonen LLC filed suit yesterday on behalf of one of the many Floyd County school educator clients, issuing the following statement: "Not only is the Floyd County School government breaching the charter agreement by violating the people of Floyd County's right to local self-governance by excluding parents, principals, and community leaders… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am
The use of this feed anywhere else violates copyright. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:31 am
Regen versus Estar was one of the key decisions of the High Court last year (Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC 63 (Pat), IPKat here). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:51 am
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
Learn from Floyd. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 6:28 pm
In Tennessee v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:38 am
The Court of Appeals concluded that the court erred by “refusing to apply” binding authority found in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
Readers who were interested in my earlier post on the landlord whose disabled tenant appealed against a possession order obtained under s21, will be interested in this quote from the final paragraph in the report in the recent case of S -v- Floyd (with the Equality and Human Rights Commission joined in as an interested party):one of the members of this court has dealt recently with an application for permission to appeal from a judgment of a Circuit Judge (Bernstein v… [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 3:13 am
One Wholesaler, Inc. v. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:20 pm
Minimax GMBH & Co v Chubb Fire Ltd, a Chancery Division decision from England and Wales, was handed down yesterday by Mr Justice Floyd. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 2:37 am
Royal Courts of Justice Author Anthony MLicence Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 genericSource Wikimedia Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Kitchin, Lord Justice Floyd and Sir Colin Rimer) Argos Ltd. v Argos Systems Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 10:13 am
The US Supreme Court on Monday denied review [order list, PDF] in the Alabama death penalty case of Floyd v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Welcome, Floyd. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
In a judgment handed down today Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556 the Court of Appeal (led by Lord Justice Floyd) has put forward a wider test for the infringement of second medical use patents. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:59 pm
Supreme Court had an opportunity in Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
The IPKat has been passed an early copy of Mr Justice Floyd's judgment from earlier today in the case of Synthon v Merz, which relates to the esoteric outer reaches of how European Community law on Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) should be interpreted. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
To a certain extent it’s reminiscent of another famous case involving artistic expression and editing by Monty Python in Gilliam v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:58 am
Suspects Must Invoke Rights Unambiguously; Justice Sotomayer Strongly and Forcefully Dissents as High Court Narrows Miranda By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair Our last post dealt with the prospect that the Obama administration may modify the long-standing “public safety exception” of Miranda v. [read post]
