Search for: "US v. Foley"
Results 41 - 60
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2010, 9:54 am
My partner, Attorney Tim Foley, and I were again successful in securing a summary judgment, this time in favor of State Farm in the somewhat novel Pike County Court of Common Pleas case of Adragna v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
(AP Photo/HBO, Helen Sloan) From a document filed in New York trial court (Foley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:34 am
While the Supreme Court’s Bilski v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
In an SDO by Judges Foley, Fujise, and Leonard, relying on its prior decision in Alakai Na Keiki, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
The "predictor" is no longer there, but the link gives us the text:Due to the effects of the Federal Circuit's en banc Phillips v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:31 am
The following alert was written by our friends at Foley & Lardner. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:31 am
The following alert was written by our friends at Foley & Lardner. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:00 am
(Filbin v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Cox used marital assets to pay his attorney. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 6:15 am
Two decisions out of the Second Circuit show that someone has a heart at Foley Square. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm
By Eric Goldman Cvent, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:05 am
In Porto v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
” Foley’s key objective is to institute electoral procedures that will lead every state to produce an identifiable majority for one candidate. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
Using the language of Dyson LJ in AMEC Capital Projects Ltd v Whitefriars City Estates Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1535, “something more is required”, which must be “something of substance”. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
It looks like USA v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
In Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
Corp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
Corp v. [read post]
