Search for: "US v. Garcia-Hernandez"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
Garcia-Villegas, No. 08-50503 (8-4-09). [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
In Alcala v Hernandez, 2014 WL 5506739 (D.S.C.) [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 5:20 am
In Alcala v Hernandez, 2016 WL 3343251 (4th Cir.,2016) in June 2013, Appellee Claudia Garcia Hernandez (Mother) removed her two minor children from their home in Mexico and arrived in South Carolina in August 2013. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:19 am
In Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) the District Court granted the petition for return. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 11:48 am
In Castellon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
Use Garcia-Jimenez when a court tries to whitewash an incorrect guideline calc with threats of an identical § 3553(a) term. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:39 am
"From Friday's Hernandez v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Garcia. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:13 am
Garcia, 23 F.3d 1331, 1334-35 & n.2 (8th Cir. 1994); United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 12:06 pm
Garcia Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 12:06 pm
Garcia Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
Garcia, 2006 U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Hernandez, 279 F.3d 302, 306 (5th Cir. 2002), and may `affirm the district court's ruling ... based on any rationale supported by the record. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
ELRAC, Inc., 52 AD3d 262 [1st Dept. 2008]); Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 17-5283, Garcia-Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
The government’s primary counter-argument, mirroring the 6th Circuit’s rationale in Garcia-Romo v. [read post]