Search for: "US v. Hampton"
Results 1 - 20
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 1:49 pm
Specifically, the most recent related cases are Friends of East Hampton Airport, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
The complaint (full text) in Verizon New York Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 5:07 am
East Hampton has a law that requires all ferry operators to obtain a special permit before using a ferry terminal within the Town and which restricts the types of ferries that may use local terminals. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:47 am
See, e.g., City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:32 pm
Slonim v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Drager, the First Department in its March 25, 2014 ruling in Hirschfeld v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:04 am
Henderson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:53 pm
The East Hampton Town Code defines commercial property, in relevant part, as “any lot containing a nonconforming business use”, and permits “any one commercial property in any district” to have “two uses. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:20 am
The complaint (full text) in Frost v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 5:30 am
In the high-stakes Estates and Trust world of Suffolk County [think East Hampton, not Patchogue], this case was reported last week. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
In Bernard v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:58 pm
” [See] United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 5:36 am
" brought an article 78 proceeding to enjoin the Town of East Hampton from all planning, permitting, use, taxation, and governance of lands located within Montauk. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
Pratt v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:53 pm
Birch Tree Partners, LLC v Nature Conservancy, 2014 WL 6462234 (NYAD 2 Dept. 11/19/2014). [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:53 pm
Birch Tree Partners, LLC v Nature Conservancy, 2014 WL 6462234 (NYAD 2 Dept. 11/19/2014). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Using her alias, Hampton bought a “Q1–level PQI membership” from Leitner for $1,280. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
In Government Employees Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:40 am
Therefore, it being allowed as a trade mark would not exclude the rightful use of ‘HAMPTON’ by the said multiple cities and villages. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:18 pm
FOLLOWING THE DUVAL MOTORS v. [read post]
