Search for: "US v. Hicks" Results 1 - 20 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 6:35 am by Amy Bray
As promised in an earlier post, below is a summary of our recent Georgia Supreme Court case of Hicks v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:47 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Hicks did not put his intent at issue during the government’s case-in-chief — he waived his opening statement and his strategy during the first half of the [...] [read post]
24 Jan 2003, 3:16 pm
Hicks [US SC docket] (trespass, First and Fourteenth Amendments; read the lower court ruling [text]) and Beneficial National Bank v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:47 am
The inference plaintiff would have us draw from this evidence is simply not reasonable. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:38 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Hicks rule A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted the appellant, Dante Henderson, of first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun, and illegal possession of a regulated firearm. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Hicks violation A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found Reginald Manning, appellant, guilty of first-degree assault, second-degree assault, unlawfully wearing and carrying a handgun, using a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence, reckless endangerment, and discharging a firearm within the city ... [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" In this case, the plaintiff states a plausible claim on his fair trial case.The case is Hicks v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Hicks A jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County convicted Norman Fisher, appellant, of first-degree assault, second-degree assault, illegal possession of ammunition, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and illegal possession of a rifle or shotgun. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:47 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Search and Seizure Consent; pretextual threats Where the lead investigator took active steps to obtain a warrant prior to entering a home with the owner’s consent, the threat to the owner that he would get a warrant if consent was denied was not pretextual. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:07 am
Though the decision likely won't impact many defendants, the Ninth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:23 am by Wells Bennett
§ 950v(b)(25) (2006), and the sentence based on Al Bahlul v. [read post]