Search for: "US v. Jeremy Doe" Results 61 - 80 of 650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
" Coca-Cola objected that permission to use its trade mark had not been granted. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
What does this latest immunotherapy patent case tell us about the law of insufficiency and obviousness and the increasingly pervasive question of plausibility, she asks? [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
British Horseracing Board v William Hill). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
Jeremy) says he thinks that, if a sign - however inherently undistinctive it may be when it starts its life - has become truly distinctive for particular goods or services, there's a general interest in making sure that it jolly well ISN'T used by others if it's going to confuse the poor old consumer. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
 As Jeremy succinctly noted in his post "the chilling effect of a threat to sue, particularly where the defendant is a retailer, distributor or other business that does not make the (non)-infringing goods, can destroy the trade of perfectly innocent traders who are not even party to the threats and who may have no idea that they have been made. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
 It was the year of Williams & Wilkins v U.S. relating to the whether the photocopying machine would put the publishing industry out of business. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
How sweet, says Jeremy.* Forsgren's SPC: what does the marketing authorisation have to say about the active ingredient? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
That is, they can be invited to enforce a federal policy (such as to do the background checks on gun buyers, at issue in the key case Printz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm by jarogeti
“Standing here turns on whether Virginia has suffered the necessary ‘injury in fact,’” wrote Circuit Judge Diana Gribbon Motz for the panel in Virginia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Does she have any legal ground to do so, wonders Eleonora? [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:01 pm by structuredsettlements
Using anecdotal evidence presented as "identified" by Jeremy Babener, an NYU law student/recent graduate specializing in taxation,  Hindert suggests and/or implies through examples that generally any benefit that Defendants get from offering structured settlements is ill gotten. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Although the Hargreaves Review does not deal with end user consumption, this is an issue that will now need to be addressed, given the controversy created by NLA v Meltwater. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
’ Despite having told their asylum officers that they feared returning, Frank Doe and Howard Doe were returned to Mexico. [read post]