Search for: "US v. Jeremy Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
’ Despite having told their asylum officers that they feared returning, Frank Doe and Howard Doe were returned to Mexico. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
The case is Stacey Mattocks v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
Jeremy opens the discussion. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
Overcoming a traditional idea peculiar to Spanish trade mark law, that court eventually puts an end to the concept of trade marks giving its owner the (positive) right to use the sign protected thereby.* First confidentiality, now costs: Vestergaard v Bestnet refuses to go awayVestergaard Fransen S/A & others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others is a case that simply refuses to go away, writes Jeremy. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
In this sense, some insurers have used the policy duties as a shield to appraisal.The current paradox was revealed by Jeremy’s post; Litigating The Right To Resolve Disputes Without Litigation, from March 7, 2011. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
He does this again by use of vivid scenarios. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Find out in this Jeremy's post.* The case against patents: what does first-mover advantage tell us? [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:25 pm
Authored by Jeremy W. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm
Jeremy Gordon provided a comprehensive summary and analysis of oral arguments in McKeever v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
From an IP angle, of course.* Linking, copyright and ancillary rights: what does the Commission intend to do? [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Secondly, does parody have to comply with the originality requirement? [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:22 am
Finally, on Afro-IP, Jeremy Speres writes up a recent South African case on notional trade mark use and fish and chips, a decision in which both parties are Lucky but only one of them is really Lucky. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
I previewed both cases for this blog (here and here), while Nina Totenberg (with help from Isaac Chaput) does the same for NPR. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Does that list reflects the idiosyncrasies of The Economist as much as the objective indicia considered? [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
Since this "Minister" does not write his own speeches, Jeremy was able to offer some suggestions as to might profitably be said. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
* Does an invention have a sole? [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
In a recent New York County Criminal Court decision, People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
The judge explained that the source code for the RoundUp program is not relevant because investigating the use of a peer-to-peer file sharing program does not violate the 4th Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches. [read post]
