Search for: "US v. Laurent"
Results 41 - 60
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
Louboutin's complaint argues that Yves Saint Laurent's use of the red sole is "likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake and deception among the relevant purchasing public. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
When I give a Christmas present, I like it to be something useful and enduring. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was said, in the important ruling in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent 29-30- that:‘We conclude, based on the record before us, that Louboutin has not established secondary meaning in an application of a red sole to a red shoe, but only where the red sole contrasts with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
YSL's Tribute shoe R is for red: Last Thursday, the final order in the infamous Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent case involving Louboutin’s red soles trade mark was entered in district court in the Southern District of New York (see previous AmeriKat reporting on the case here). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Yves Sain Laurent Am., Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:46 am
Christian Louboutin SA et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
The AmeriKat snuggly asleep moments before the IPKat wakens her with news of the Louboutin judgment The AmeriKat was fast asleep in bed just now when her BlackBerry started vibrating off her bedside table with news that the long awaited judgment from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent case has just been published. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:35 pm
It’s Me, Section 421 Francesca Stefania Condello, & Laurent Ruessmann, The CJEU Judgment in Nokia and Philips Clarifies the Customs Detention of Goods Suspected of Infringing Intellectual Property RightsBrian Facey, Prakash Narayanan, & Cliff Sosnow, Promises Are Meant to Be Kept: A Case Comment on Attorney General of Canada v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Following the court filing, Yves Saint Laurent hit back arguing that Louboutin had no monopoly over the red-colored shoe soles and that similar applications were commonplace before Louboutin's use (picture, left - a Louboutin). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
Yves Saint Laurent Am., Inc., 778 F. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:12 pm
In Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:03 am
(IP Dragon) Baby Tricycle Wars: Chinese babygood group victorious against US Mattel: Babygood Group v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
Yves Saint Laurent. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
Last month, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:42 am
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:37 pm
Laurent v. [read post]
