Search for: "US v. London" Results 81 - 100 of 4,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
In C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, D insured C under a Bermuda Form policy that provided for London arbitration and was governed by New York Law. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 9:12 am
Ct. 2655 (2005), permitting the city of New London to use its eminent domain power to condemn private property for economic development. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:25 am
The FairwayCity travel is a highly litigated area at the moment but this is not a post about Uber but rather the protection of two very different modes of London transport, the black cab and the scooter.This post concerns the black cab but watch this space for more on its scooter cousin.The Court of Appeal's decision in The London Taxi Corporation v Frazer-Nash was recently handed down. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 2:55 am by CMS
In this post, Emma Pinkerton, a Partner in the Real Estate Disputes team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Wolverhampton City Council and others v London Gypsies and Travellers and others [2023] UKSC 47, which was handed down on 29 November 2023. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am by Steve Clowney
New London allows the use of eminent domain to facilitate private... [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:42 am
Daniel Sokol David Evans (University of Chicago, University College London, LECG) provides us with What You Need to Know About Twombly. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 12:02 pm
City of New London brought the issues of takings and public use into the national spotlight.... [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm by CivPro Blogger
For those of us who teach the very important Anna Nicole Smith cases, such as Marshall v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:50 am by AdminLaw Blogger
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), what constitutes public use has been a visible issue of policy and law. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The R (Bridges) v South Wales Police case A key test case on the use of FRS has been heard by the Administrative Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:40 pm by Benjamin Justus
Filed: 08/08/2016Case No. 1:16-cv-00437 LHF Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:29 am
   Insurers allege that at least four Milberg partners were involved in criminal conduct, evidenced by Milberg's resolution of a criminal indictment USA v Milberg LLP by payment of US$75m and an agreed statement of facts that records, amongst other things, the paying of 'kickbacks' to plaintiffs. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005, the focus in public use challenges to exercises of the eminent domain power has largely focused on state courts and state constitutional protections. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:00 pm by Giles Peaker
For example, Willow Court Management Company (1985) Ltd v Alexander [2016] UKUT 290 (LC) on FTT Rule 13 costs, Hoyte, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark [2016] EWHC 1665 (Admin)  on intervening events and fresh homeless applications and Huda v The London Borough of Redbridge [2016] EWCA Civ 709 on ‘settled accommodation’ (though to be scrupulously fair to us, that was only out today). [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:04 am
[JURIST] Voters in nine US states approved ballot initiatives restricting the use of eminent domain [JURIST news archive] in mid-term elections Tuesday, reacting strongly against the 2005 US Supreme Court Kelo v. [read post]